On November 4th American voters will have to make sure their votes are taken into account. According to the New York Times the Diebold electronic voting machines, in which people will drop their votes nearly 3 weeks from today, have reported malfunctions.

The first reports of the machine’s miscounts were spotted and notified by election officials in Ohio in March primary count. Since then, Diebold has notified malfunctions in the machines of 30 more states. The votes that are dropped in the Diebold machines should be transferred from each machine to a central county election headquarter. An election worker inserts the memory card from the machine into the server. When this is done, a green arrow should appear as a signal that all the votes have been uploaded and added to the county’s total. On the machines that do not work correctly, the green arrow is wrong and none of the votes are added to the county’s server

When this problem was first spotted by Ohio election officials, Diebold  suggested  it was due to human errors or  an anti virus  on the machines  may have affected them.  But about 5 months later, in August, the company notified its clients the problem was a software glitch. The solution for this glitch would be to thoroughly check that every memory card was counted appropriately because there is no time to upgrade all the machines that need fixing. In case the votes are not uploaded, they can still be recovered, but since it depends on election workers to notice the malfunction and do something about it which is not a reliable option because election workers as volunteers, have thousands of tasks to perform in a very short time and with a whole lot of responsibility.

The New York Times editorial writes: ” Now it seems that hardly an election goes by without reports of serious vulnerabilities or malfunctions.” and they are most certainly right. Diebold has been sued by the Secretary of State in Ohio, Jennifer Brunner, who claims it’s machines crashed several times during the last year’s election in Cuyahoga County. Yet they were hired for the federal election as well.

A computer glitch is by definition any computer error. The word glitch, however, has a Yiddish origin glitsh which is a slippery area. The way things are going with the US election and it’s slippery machines, we cannot expect anything less than a very tense election day. We wouldnt want those votes slipping like they did last time in Florida.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/opinion/09thu2.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin

Well, it's just curious how

Bilhá Calderón on Jue, 10/09/2008 - 19:44
Well, it's just curious how a company that has proven to be inefficient gets a second even bigger task at something it didn't manage to deliver the last time. Diebold may say it's a clitch, but it sounds like a clitsh to me... a slippery floor just ready for us to fall on our tushy

34 other Dutch cities may be using paper and pencil

Hildebrando y Asociados on Jue, 10/09/2008 - 19:17
The Associated Press Published: October 30, 2006 AMSTERDAM, Netherlands Voters in Amsterdam and 34 other Dutch cities may be using paper and pencil instead of computerized voting machines in national elections next month. The government on Monday banned the use of one common type of computer voting machine, fearing that secret ballots may not be kept secret. It ordered a review of all electronic machines after the Nov. 22 election. Government Renewal Minister Atzo Nicolai said the move was necessary after an investigation found the machines made by Sdu NV emitted radio signals that a technology-savvy spy could use to peek at a voters' choices from a distance of up to several dozen meters (yards). "What can be detected is the image on the screen that's visible to the voter, by which his voting could be monitored," Nicolai said in a letter to parliament. "In short, the machines made by the company Sdu can now be tapped, and there are no technical measures that can be taken before the upcoming elections that would prevent this tapping and guarantee the secrecy of the ballot." He said he had revoked the permits for all the machines, about 10 percent of all voting machines used in the country. A sample of the other machines used in next month's vote will be tested before the results are certified to ensure against fraud, Nicolai said. The turnabout came after a group called "We Don't Trust Voting Computers" protested the vulnerability of electronic voting to fraud or manipulation. "I think this will have repercussions far beyond Holland" said Rop Gonggrijp, one of the group's founders, after Monday's announcement. "Holland was one of the first countries to use e-voting widely, certainly in Europe, and it has played a leading role in adoption of voting machines, so it's only natural that Holland be one of the first to realize there are drawbacks," he said, calling the adoption of voting machines a "hasty decision."

Thank you very much for that

Bilha Calderón on Jue, 10/09/2008 - 19:31
Thank you very much for that information Mr Hildebrando :) Indeed, many elections that have used these sort of 'election software' have failed or left voters with many doubts about what really happens with their votes once they leave the computer or the machine. Computer specialists have talked about those machines being very easy to hack and even flip votes on their own (or so it seems). There's nothing wrong with voting like in the good ol' times if you ask me. paper ballots give the opportunity to have physical recounts, with a computer, that's a bit harder. Well... you must know Mr. Hildebrando, don't you? Regards Bilhá

Holand

Anonimo on Jue, 10/09/2008 - 19:12
IN Holand, this machin vote is out.

Yup, it seems many countries

Bilhá Calderón on Jue, 10/09/2008 - 19:33
Yup, it seems many countries have realized these voting machines aren't too reliable. Regards B.

Voting Machines?

Anonimo on Jue, 10/09/2008 - 18:34
The right wing is starting to set up the fraud machine.

Czdnikus

Czdnikus on Lun, 07/13/2009 - 21:05
RfeUqO

Sorry

Bilhá Calderón on Jue, 10/09/2008 - 19:47
that last one was meant as a response to you. Regards B.